Give a Practical World Application of the two Methodologies - 550 Words

Give a Practical World Application of the two Methodologies (Essay Sample) Content: PROJECT MANAGEMENT MODELSEskerod Riis (2009, p.8) clarifies that changes in organizations are delivered through implementation of projects and sharing plans for a project. Project management has developed over the years some management methodologies are available for businesses to utilize to manage projects. Among the most used methods include PRINCE 2 and AGILE. PRINCE 2 is the worldà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬s most popular project management framework which is made up of integrated different elements. The primary features that PRINCE 2 is based on are the processes, themes, principles and tailoring the methodology to suit project needs. On the other hand, AGILE is an approach that uses iterative procedures to determine the requirements of development projects especially for information technology projects (Malik 2013, p.57).PRINCE 2 methodology is principlesà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬ based which makes it possible for the approach in providing a framework that is applicable irrespective of projec t scale, organization, geography, type of project or culture (Burtonshaw 2008). This methodology operates under a controlled environment which helps project managers to assign roles to different team members by considering their expertise. The method is also flexible making it easy to make changes depending on the size of the project, objectives, and requirements of the organization. The flexibility in its theoretical approach makes the methodology familiar with project managers. Bentley (2004, p. 217) explains that PRINCE 2 has advantages that are beneficial to the organization. First, the approach is product based and divides a project into phases making it easy to manage. The division of the project into stages helps the project management to remain focused and ensures they deliver quality work. Second, the methodology improves communication among the team members and as well as the team and the interested external stakeholders. Third is that the team learns how to save time and become more economical when it comes to the utilization of assets and other resources. However, this methodology is disadvantaged in that it does not provide the required level of flexibility demanded by some modern projects. For instance, the software industry is experiencing tremendous growth requiring new and sophisticated innovations. PRINCE 2 may find it difficult to cater for some of these modern projects. On the other side, AGILE methodology divides a project into sprints that are then assigned to small groups (Cobb 2011, p. 563). This iterative approach of AGILE ensures that there is adequate monitoring of a project, and also it is possible to make immediate changes as opposed to constant review. One of the pros associated with AGILE is that the iterations provide instantaneous feedback. Additionally, the sprints in the methodology ensure that defects are fewer in the final product owing to quality assurance tests perfumed in each cycle. The method has a disadvantage in that immediate feedback sometimes result to scope creed. In his book (Maylor 2010) argues that the two methodologies are similar in that they have a common central theme; the provision of templates, techniques and tools for project management hence avoiding the need for reinvention. Both methods seek to lower inherent risks arising from undertaking projects. The fundamental difference between the two methodologies is that PRINCE 2 focuses on planning and analyzing the future and caters for possible hazards. In contrast, AGILE is more flexible and requires no substantial changes and networking. In conclusion, both approaches are essential for project management, but PRINCE 2 proves a better methodology. Vodafone provides an excellent example in a successful application of PRINCE 2. The company applied this approach in 2003 in the à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‹Å"à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Improving Capabilityà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ãƒ ¢Ã¢â€š ¬ project which ended in 2004. The end results were that the firm was awarded level 3 in both PMMM and P2MM by APM. The company also saved  £1.2M from the project (Kujala et al.2010, p. 368)

New SAT Essay Response, Score of 6

Hey SAT practicers! If you’re just joining us, this is Part 2 of a series of essay attempts to this new SAT essay practice prompt. If you haven’t done so already, try your hand at the essay first and then see how it compares to this essay and an 8-point essay. For reminders on how the new SAT is scored, you can go here. Also, if you simply can’t get enough of new SAT essay prompts, you can find another one here. Lets get to writing! Example 6-point New SAT Essay In Barbara Ehrenreich’s article â€Å"The Selfish Side of Gratitude,† she argues that expressing gratitude has become a selfish act. Ehrenreich uses evidence from popular news sources, real world events and appeal to emotion to argue her thesis. The first example Ehrenreich uses to show that gratitude has a selfish side is evidence from a popular news site. She says â€Å"much of the gratitude advice involves no communication or interaction of any kind† and then uses a CNN article from a yoga instructor to show that this is the case. If one looks at the advice, one will see that Ehrenreich has a point because the advice doesn’t mention showing gratitude to other people at all. This example is effective because it shows that the media is influencing our perception of gratitude and making us selfish about it. Ehrenreich also uses real world events to show why gratitude has become a selfish act. She talks about the financial crash of 2008 and how it’s related to gratitude (â€Å"The financial crash of 2008 further dimmed the luster of positive thinking†¦This left the self-improvement field open to more cautious stances, like mindfulness and resilience and — for those who could still muster it — gratitude†). By discussing such a famous event, Ehrenreich not only grabs the audience’s attention, but shows how gratitude is related to the problematic way of thinking (positive thinking) that caused the horrible event in the first place. Finally, Ehrenreich appeals to the emotions when she talks about how we need to show gratitude to other people. She says â€Å"there is a need for more gratitude, especially from those who have a roof over their heads and food on their table† which implies that rich people need to be more grateful to the poor people that help us. Then, she provides a lot of details about all the people that are involved in providing meals and how they have â€Å"aching backs and tenuous finances†. All these details about how tough the jobs of these people are and how they make up whole communities is heart-renching. Ehrenreich’s appeal to emotion is effective because it forces us to admit that not enough people show their gratitude to others in the way that Ehrenreich is describing. Overall, Ehrenreich does a good job about making us realize that gratitude has a selfish side. She does that through using evidence in the form of popular news sources, real world events, and appeals to emotion. Why this essay would receive an 6 If you were to talk to a College Board essay grader, I believe the key word you would hear from them in describing this essay is â€Å"competent.† Although there’s definite room for improvement, the writer showed competence in all three grading categories. Reading comprehension: In all the examples the writer used in their essay, the writer shows a solid understanding of the passage through paraphrasing and direct quotes from the passage. However, the writer could also have provided more details in their paraphrasing for a higher score. For example, the writer could have included quotes from the yoga instructor to bolster the statement â€Å"the advice doesn’t mention showing gratitude to other people at all.† Analysis: The writer also had a good understanding of what they were supposed to analyze. They discussed concrete examples taken from the text and explained what they served to do. For a higher score, the writer could have further developed details used from the passage (e.g. use better or additional evidence that linked the 2008 financial crash to gratitude) or elaborated further on the effectiveness of the examples they used (e.g. why exactly does â€Å"[forcing] us to admit that not enough people show their gratitude to others in the way that Ehrenreich is describing† prove that gratitude is selfish?) Writing: The writer has a good knowledge of how to organize their essay (though it might be too formulaic) and can more or less express themself clearly. Sometimes, however, they lapse into common speech (â€Å"†¦Ehrenreich appeals to the emotions when she talks about†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ) and makes noticeable punctuation errors.